link rel="DCTERMS.isreplacedby" href="http://www.msquaredt.com/blog/" >
:: M squared T ::Do you have an M Squared life? Matt does... | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
:: welcome to M squared T :: bloghome | atom xml feed | e-mail :: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
:: Monday, February 07, 2005 :: Update on Friday's Post
Comments:
So they're saying you can't discuss the different translations? It makes me wonder if they're against the others or they just don't want to deal with the arguements that will ensue.
Are you going to continue your membership?
Aimee -
Post a Comment
I have withdrawn my membership from the group. I have a number of reasons, but basically the tone and perspective of the group did not fit with what I wanted to spend time doing. As for the Bible translations, I believe they feel the discussion is too controversial: some people really believe that the King James is the ONLY permissible English translation of the Bible. As a historian and classicist, I could not agree with them. The King James was good for its time (400 years ago), and still remains classic English literature. However, with continued work in scholarship, discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls in 1947, etc., the newer translations are more reflective of the original text than the King James is. Nonetheless, there are still many who consider the King James to be the Bible that Jesus himself used, English language notwithstanding, and that the use of any other translation is anathema. As you may have deduced, the Christians I regularly fellowship with are so far from such discussions they probably don't realize that such things are "controversial" in the least. Their assumptions about such things are different. Peace in Christ!
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||